| Expression | Equivalent expression |
|---|---|
| $p \rightarrow q$ | $\equiv \sim p \lor q$ |
| $p$ implies $q$ | $\equiv p \rightarrow q$ |
| (Contrapositive of $p \rightarrow q$) | $\equiv \sim q \rightarrow \sim p$ |
| (Converse of $p \rightarrow q$) | $\equiv q \rightarrow p$ |
| (Inverse of $p \rightarrow q$) | $\equiv \sim p \rightarrow \sim q$ |
| $p$ is sufficient for $q$ | $\equiv p \rightarrow q$ |
| $p$ is not sufficient for $q$ | $\equiv \sim (p \rightarrow q)$ |
| $p$ is necessary for $q$ | $\equiv q \rightarrow p$ |
| $p$ is not necessary for $q$ | $\equiv \sim (q \rightarrow p)$ |
| $p$ if $q$ | $\equiv q \rightarrow p$ |
| $p$ only if $q$ | $\equiv p \rightarrow q$ |
| $p$ if and only if $q$ | $\equiv p \leftrightarrow q$ |
| $p$ when/whenever $q$ | $\equiv q \rightarrow p$ |
| $p$ unless $q$ | $\equiv \sim q \rightarrow p$ |
| $p$ follows from $q$ | $\equiv q \rightarrow p$ |
| $p$, provided that $q$ | $\equiv q \rightarrow p$ |
| $p$ | $q$ | $r$ | $p \oplus q$ | $\sim q$ | $\sim r$ | $\sim q \rightarrow \sim r$ | $(p \oplus q) \leftrightarrow (\sim q \rightarrow \sim r)$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ |
| $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ |
| $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $F$ |
| $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ |
| $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ |
| $p$ | $q$ | $r$ | $\sim p$ | $q \land r$ | $q \lor r$ | $\sim p \rightarrow (q \land r)$ | $\sim p \lor (q \lor r)$ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ |
| $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ |
| $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ |
| $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ |
The 7th and 8th columns are different at rows 4, 6, 7, and 8.
So, $\sim p \rightarrow (q \land r) \not\equiv \sim p \lor (q \lor r)$.
Subproblem 1.
If Jules solved this problem correctly, then Jules obtained the answer 2.
Jules obtained the answer 2.
$\therefore$ Jules solved this problem correctly.
Subproblem 2.
This real number is rational or it is irrational.
This real number is not rational.
$\therefore$ This real number is irrational.
Subproblem 3.
If I go to the movies, I won't finish my homework.
If I don't finish my homework, I won't do well on the exam tomorrow.
$\therefore$ If I go to the movies, I won't do well on the exam tomorrow.
Subproblem 4.
If this number is larger than 2, then its square is larger than 4.
This number is not larger than 2.
$\therefore$ The square of this number is not larger than 4.
Let $p$ denote ''Jules solved this problem correctly'' and $q$ denote ''Jules obtained the answer 2''.
Logical form:
\begin{align*}
& p \rightarrow q \\
& q \\
& \therefore p
\end{align*}
Invalid (Converse error). A conditional is not equivalent to its converse. When $p$ is false and $q$ is true, both premises are true but the conclusion is false.
Let $p$ denote ''This real number is rational'' and $q$ denote ''This real number is irrational''.
Logical form:
\begin{align*}
& p \lor q \\
& \sim p \\
& \therefore q
\end{align*}
Valid (Elimination).
Let $p$ denote ''I go to the movies'', $q$ denote ''I finish my homework'', and $r$ denote ''I do well on the exam tomorrow''.
Logical form:
\begin{align*}
& p \rightarrow \sim q \\
& \sim q \rightarrow \sim r \\
& \therefore p \rightarrow \sim r
\end{align*}
Valid (Transitivity). Here $\sim q$ plays the role of the middle statement in the rule.
Let $p$ denote ''This number is larger than 2'' and $q$ denote ''The square of this number is larger than 4''.
Logical form:
\begin{align*}
& p \rightarrow q \\
& \sim p \\
& \therefore \sim q
\end{align*}
Invalid (Inverse error). A conditional is not equivalent to its inverse. When $p$ is false and $q$ is true, both premises are true but the conclusion is false. (For example, the number $-3$ is not larger than 2, but its square, 9, is larger than 4.)
| Premises | Conclusion | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $p$ | $q$ | $r$ | $\sim q$ | $p$ | $p \rightarrow q$ | $\sim q \lor r$ | $r$ |
| $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ |
| $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ |
| $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ |
| $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ |
A row in which all the premises are true is a critical row. An argument form is valid if the conclusion is true in every critical row.
Only row 1 (the highlighted row) is a critical row, and the conclusion $r$ is true in it.
So, the argument form is valid.
| Premises | Conclusion | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $p$ | $q$ | $r$ | $\sim q$ | $p \lor q$ | $p \rightarrow \sim q$ | $p \rightarrow r$ | $r$ |
| $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $F$ |
| $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ |
| $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ |
| $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $T$ |
| $F$ | $F$ | $F$ | $T$ | $F$ | $T$ | $T$ | $F$ |
A row in which all the premises are true is a critical row. An argument form is invalid if the conclusion is false in at least one critical row.
Rows 3, 5, and 6 are critical rows. In row 6 ($p$ is false, $q$ is true, and $r$ is false), all the premises are true but the conclusion $r$ is false.
So, the argument form is invalid.
By the precedence of the logical operators, (a) is $(\sim p \lor q) \rightarrow r$ and (e) is $(\sim p \land r) \rightarrow \sim s$.
1. \begin{align*} & p \rightarrow t && \text{by (d)} \\ & \sim t && \text{by (c)} \\ & \therefore \sim p && \text{by modus tollens} \end{align*}
2. \begin{align*} & \sim p && \text{by the conclusion of (1)} \\ & \therefore \sim p \lor q && \text{by generalization} \end{align*}
3. \begin{align*} & (\sim p \lor q) \rightarrow r && \text{by (a)} \\ & \sim p \lor q && \text{by the conclusion of (2)} \\ & \therefore r && \text{by modus ponens} \end{align*}
4. \begin{align*} & \sim p && \text{by the conclusion of (1)} \\ & r && \text{by the conclusion of (3)} \\ & \therefore \sim p \land r && \text{by conjunction} \end{align*}
5. \begin{align*} & (\sim p \land r) \rightarrow \sim s && \text{by (e)} \\ & \sim p \land r && \text{by the conclusion of (4)} \\ & \therefore \sim s && \text{by modus ponens} \end{align*}
6. \begin{align*} & s \lor \sim q && \text{by (b)} \\ & \sim s && \text{by the conclusion of (5)} \\ & \therefore \sim q && \text{by elimination} \end{align*}
Thus, $\sim q$ follows from the premises.
By the precedence of the logical operators, (a) is $\sim p \rightarrow (r \land \sim s)$.
1. \begin{align*} & u \lor w && \text{by (e)} \\ & \sim w && \text{by (d)} \\ & \therefore u && \text{by elimination} \end{align*}
2. \begin{align*} & u \rightarrow \sim p && \text{by (c)} \\ & u && \text{by the conclusion of (1)} \\ & \therefore \sim p && \text{by modus ponens} \end{align*}
3. \begin{align*} & \sim p \rightarrow (r \land \sim s) && \text{by (a)} \\ & \sim p && \text{by the conclusion of (2)} \\ & \therefore r \land \sim s && \text{by modus ponens} \end{align*}
4. \begin{align*} & r \land \sim s && \text{by the conclusion of (3)} \\ & \therefore \sim s && \text{by specialization} \end{align*}
5. \begin{align*} & t \rightarrow s && \text{by (b)} \\ & \sim s && \text{by the conclusion of (4)} \\ & \therefore \sim t && \text{by modus tollens} \end{align*}
Thus, $\sim t$ follows from the premises.
Direct proof.
Formal statement: $\forall$ integer $n$, if $n$ is odd, then $3n+5$ is even.
Suppose $n$ is odd. Then:
\begin{align*}
& 3n + 5 \\
&= 3(2k+1) + 5 && \text{(defn. of odd, } n = 2k+1 \text{ for integer } k \text{)}\\
&= 6k + 8 && \text{(simplifying)}\\
&= 2(3k+4) && \text{(taking 2 as common factor)}\\
&= 2p && \text{(} p = 3k+4 \text{ and mult. and add. are closed on integers)}\\
&= \text{even} && \text{(defn. of even)}\\
\end{align*}
Direct proof.
Formal statement: $\forall$ integers $a, b$, if $a$ and $b$ are odd, then $a^2 + b^2$ is even.
Suppose $a$ and $b$ are odd. Then:
\begin{align*}
& a^2 + b^2 \\
&= (2m+1)^2 + (2n+1)^2 && \text{(defn. of odd; } a = 2m+1, b = 2n+1 \text{)}\\
&= 4m^2 + 4m + 1 + 4n^2 + 4n + 1 && \text{(expand)}\\
&= 2(2m^2 + 2m + 2n^2 + 2n + 1) && \text{(taking 2 as common factor)}\\
&= 2p && \text{(} p = 2m^2 + 2m + 2n^2 + 2n + 1 \text{ is an integer)}\\
&= \text{even} && \text{(defn. of even)}\\
\end{align*}
Direct proof.
Formal statement: $\forall$ integer $n \gt 4$, if $n$ is a perfect square, then $n-1$ is not prime.
Suppose $n \gt 4$ is a perfect square. Then:
\begin{align*}
& n = k^2 \text{ for some integer } k \ge 0 && \text{(defn. of perfect square; take } k \ge 0 \text{)}\\
& \implies k^2 \gt 4 && \text{(} n \gt 4 \text{)}\\
& \implies k \ge 3 && \text{(} k \text{ is a nonnegative integer)}\\
\end{align*}
Now consider $n - 1$.
\begin{align*}
& n - 1 \\
&= k^2 - 1 && \text{(} n = k^2 \text{)}\\
&= (k-1)(k+1) && \text{(difference of two squares)}\\
&= \text{composite} && \text{(} 1 \lt k-1 \lt n-1 \text{ and } 1 \lt k+1 \lt n-1 \text{; see below)}\\
\end{align*}
We have $1 \lt k-1$ and $1 \lt k+1$ since $k \ge 3$. Also, $k-1 \lt (k-1)(k+1) = n-1$ since $k+1 \gt 1$, and $k+1 \lt (k-1)(k+1) = n-1$ since $k-1 \gt 1$. So $n-1$ is a product of two natural numbers that are strictly between $1$ and $n-1$. Hence $n-1$ is composite, and so it is not prime.
False!
Counterexample: $a = -3$ and $b = 2$.
In this example, $a^2 = 9 \gt 4 = b^2$ but $a \lt b$.
| Expression | Result | Proof technique |
|---|---|---|
| rational + rational | rational | Direct proof |
| rational + irrational | irrational | Contradiction |
| irrational + irrational | rational or irrational | Examples: $\sqrt{2} + (-\sqrt{2}) = 0$ and $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \sqrt{2}$ |
| rational $\times$ rational | rational | Direct proof |
| rational $\times$ irrational | rational or irrational | Examples $0 \times \sqrt{2} = 0$ and $1 \times \sqrt{2} = \sqrt{2}$ |
| irrational $\times$ irrational | rational or irrational | Examples $\sqrt{2} \times \sqrt{2} = 2$ and $\sqrt{2} \times \sqrt{3} = \sqrt{6}$ |
| nonzero rational $\times$ irrational | irrational | Contradiction |
| rational$^{\text{rational}}$ | rational or irrational | Examples $1^1 = 1$ and $2^{1/2} = \sqrt{2}$ |
Proof by contradiction.
Negation. Suppose there are positive real numbers $r$ and $s$ such that $\sqrt{r+s} = \sqrt{r} + \sqrt{s}$.
\begin{align*}
& \sqrt{r+s} = \sqrt{r} + \sqrt{s} \\
& \implies r + s = r + 2\sqrt{r}\sqrt{s} + s && \text{(squaring on both sides)}\\
& \implies 0 = 2\sqrt{r}\sqrt{s} && \text{(subtracting } r + s \text{ from both sides)}\\
& \implies \sqrt{r}\sqrt{s} = 0 && \text{(dividing by 2)}\\
& \implies \sqrt{r} = 0 \text{ or } \sqrt{s} = 0 && \text{(a product is zero only if a factor is zero)}\\
& \implies r = 0 \text{ or } s = 0 && \text{(squaring)}\\
\end{align*}
Contradiction! Both $r$ and $s$ are positive. Hence, the proposition is true.
Proof by contraposition.
Contrapositive. If $\sqrt{r+s} = \sqrt{r} + \sqrt{s}$, then $r$ and $s$ are not both positive.
\begin{align*}
& \sqrt{r+s} = \sqrt{r} + \sqrt{s} \\
& \implies r + s = r + 2\sqrt{r}\sqrt{s} + s && \text{(squaring on both sides)}\\
& \implies \sqrt{r}\sqrt{s} = 0 && \text{(subtracting } r + s \text{ and dividing by 2)}\\
& \implies r = 0 \text{ or } s = 0 && \text{(a product is zero only if a factor is zero)}\\
& \implies r \text{ and } s \text{ are not both positive} && \text{(} 0 \text{ is not positive)}\\
\end{align*}
Hence, the proposition is true.
Proof by contradiction.
Negation. Suppose $n^2 + 3n - 7$ is even and $n$ is even.
\begin{align*}
& n \text{ is even} \\
& \implies n = 2k && \text{(defn. of even, } k \in \mathbb{Z} \text{)}\\
& \implies n^2 + 3n - 7 = 4k^2 + 6k - 7 && \text{(substitute } n = 2k \text{)}\\
& \implies n^2 + 3n - 7 = 2(2k^2 + 3k - 4) + 1 && \text{(take 2 common)}\\
& \implies n^2 + 3n - 7 \text{ is odd} && \text{(defn. of odd, } 2k^2 + 3k - 4 \in \mathbb{Z} \text{)}\\
\end{align*}
Contradiction! $n^2 + 3n - 7$ is even, but an integer cannot be both even and odd. Hence, the proposition is true.
Proof by contraposition.
Contrapositive. If $n$ is even, then $n^2 + 3n - 7$ is odd.
\begin{align*}
& n \text{ is even} \\
& \implies n = 2k && \text{(defn. of even, } k \in \mathbb{Z} \text{)}\\
& \implies n^2 + 3n - 7 = 4k^2 + 6k - 7 && \text{(substitute } n = 2k \text{)}\\
& \implies n^2 + 3n - 7 = 2(2k^2 + 3k - 4) + 1 && \text{(take 2 common)}\\
& \implies n^2 + 3n - 7 \text{ is odd} && \text{(defn. of odd, } 2k^2 + 3k - 4 \in \mathbb{Z} \text{)}\\
\end{align*}
Hence, the contrapositive is true, and so the proposition is true.
Proof by contraposition and division into cases.
Contrapositive. For integers $a$, $b$, $c$, if $a$ and $b$ are odd, then $a^2 + b^2 \ne c^2$.
Suppose $a$ and $b$ are odd. Consider
\begin{align*}
& a^2 + b^2 \\
&= (2m+1)^2 + (2n+1)^2 && \text{(defn. of odd; } a = 2m+1, b = 2n+1 \text{)}\\
&= 4m^2 + 4n^2 + 4m + 4n + 2 && \text{(expand)}\\
&= 4(m^2 + n^2 + m + n) + 2 && \text{(take common factor)}\\
&\equiv 2 \bmod 4 && \text{(remainder is 2 when divided by 4)}\\
\end{align*}
Now let $c$ be any integer. We know $c = 2k$ or $c = 2k+1$ (quotient-remainder theorem). So we have two cases:
In both cases, $c^2 \not\equiv 2 \bmod 4$ (remainder is never 2 when divided by 4). But $a^2 + b^2 \equiv 2 \bmod 4$. So $a^2 + b^2 \ne c^2$. Hence, the contrapositive is true, and so the proposition is true.
Direct proof.
Formal statement. $\forall$ nonnegative real numbers $a$ and $b$,
$\frac{a+b}{2} \ge \sqrt{ab}.$
Since $a,b \ge 0$, the expression $(\sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b})^2$ is well-defined and nonnegative. Thus,
$(\sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b})^2 \ge 0.$
We have
Therefore, the arithmetic mean of two nonnegative real numbers is never smaller than the geometric mean.
Proof by contradiction.
Negation: Suppose that there exist nonnegative real numbers $a$ and $b$ such that
$\frac{a+b}{2} < \sqrt{ab}.$ Then
\begin{align*}
&\frac{a+b}{2} < \sqrt{ab} && \text{(supposition of negation)}\\
&\implies a + b < 2\sqrt{ab} && \text{(multiply by 2)}\\
&\implies a + b - 2\sqrt{ab} < 0 && \text{(rewrite)}\\
&\implies (\sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b})^2 < 0 && \text{(simplify)}
\end{align*}
However, for all real numbers, a square is always nonnegative, so
$
(\sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b})^2 \ge 0,
$
which is a contradiction.
Therefore, our assumption is false, and it must be that
$
\frac{a+b}{2} \ge \sqrt{ab}
$
for all nonnegative real numbers $a$ and $b$.
Proof by division into cases.
Let $n$ be any integer. By the quotient-remainder theorem, when $n$ is divided by $3$, exactly one of the following three cases occurs:
Therefore, in every case, one of the integers $n$, $n+1$, and $n+2$ is divisible by $3$.
Next, by the quotient-remainder theorem, every integer is either even or odd. So we consider two cases:
We have, $ 2 \mid n(n+1)(n+2) \text{ and } 3 \mid n(n+1)(n+2). $ Since $\gcd(2,3)=1$, it follows that $ 6 \mid n(n+1)(n+2). $ Therefore, the product of three consecutive integers is divisible by $6$.
Let $k \ge 1$ be an integer. By the given formula, $c_{k-1} = 2^{k-1} - 1$. Then, \begin{align*} & 2 c_{k-1} + 1 \\ &= 2 (2^{k-1} - 1) + 1 && (\because \text{substitute } c_{k-1} = 2^{k-1}-1) \\ &= 2^{k} - 2 + 1 && (\because \text{simplify}) \\ &= 2^k - 1 \\ &= c_k && (\because \text{by the given formula}) \end{align*} So $c_k = 2c_{k-1}+1$ for every integer $k \ge 1$, and the sequence satisfies the given recurrence relation.
Cover the common mistakes from all topics for the midterm from Common Mistakes file.
| Function | Sets (Domain and codomain) | One-to-one function? | Onto function? |
|---|---|---|---|
| $f(x) = x$ | $f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ | ✓ | ✓ |
| $f(x) = x$ | $f:\mathbb{Z} \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}$ | ✓ | ✓ |
| $f(x) = x^2$ | $f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ | ✗ | ✗ |
| $f(x) = x^2$ | $f:\mathbb{Z} \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}$ | ✗ | ✗ |
| $f(x) = x^3$ | $f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ | ✓ | ✓ |
| $f(x) = x^3$ | $f:\mathbb{Z} \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}$ | ✓ | ✗ |
| $f(x) = 2^x$ | $f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ | ✓ | ✗ |
| $f(x) = 2^x$ | $f:\mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ | ✓ | ✗ |
| $f(x) = 3^x$ | $f:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ | ✓ | ✗ |
| $f(x) = 3^x$ | $f:\mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ | ✓ | ✗ |
| $f(x) = \sqrt{x}$ | $f:\mathbb{R}^{\ge 0} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{\ge 0}$ | ✓ | ✓ |
| $f(x) = \sqrt{x}$ | $f:\mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{\ge 0}$ | ✓ | ✗ |
| $f(x) = \log_2(x)$ | $f:\mathbb{R}^{+} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ | ✓ | ✓ |
| $f(x) = \log_2(x)$ | $f:\mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{\ge 0}$ | ✓ | ✗ |
| If | and if | Then |
|---|---|---|
| $f$ is one-to-one | $g$ is one-to-one | $g \circ f$ is one-to-one. |
| $f$ is onto | $g$ is onto | $g \circ f$ is onto. |
| $f$ is a correspondence | $g$ is a correspondence | $g \circ f$ is a correspondence. |
| $g \circ f$ is one-to-one | $-$ | $f$ is one-to-one. |
| $g \circ f$ is onto | $-$ | $g$ is onto. |
| $g \circ f$ is one-to-one | $f$ is onto | $g$ is one-to-one. |
| $g \circ f$ is onto | $g$ is one-to-one | $f$ is onto. |
| $g \circ f$ is a correspondence | $-$ | $f$ is one-to-one and $g$ is onto. |
| $g \circ f$ is a correspondence | $f$ is onto | $g$ is a correspondence. |
| $g \circ f$ is a correspondence | $g$ is one-to-one | $f$ is a correspondence. |
| $f$ is not one-to-one | $-$ | $g \circ f$ is not one-to-one. |
| $g$ is not onto | $-$ | $g \circ f$ is not onto. |
| $g \circ f$ is not one-to-one | $f$ is onto | $g$ is not one-to-one. |
| $g \circ f$ is not onto | $g$ is one-to-one | $f$ is not onto. |
| If | Then |
|---|---|
| $R$ is reflexive | $R^{-1}$ is reflexive |
| $R$ is symmetric | $R^{-1}$ is symmetric |
| $R$ is transitive | $R^{-1}$ is transitive |
| $R$ and $S$ are reflexive | $R \cup S$ is reflexive |
| $R$ and $S$ are symmetric | $R \cup S$ is symmetric |
| $R$ and $S$ are reflexive | $R \cap S$ is reflexive |
| $R$ and $S$ are symmetric | $R \cap S$ is symmetric |
| $R$ and $S$ are transitive | $R \cap S$ is transitive |
| $R$ and $S$ are transitive | $R^{-1} \cap S^{-1}$ is transitive |
| $R$ is an equivalence relation | $R^{-1}$ is an equivalence relation |
| $R$ and $S$ are equivalence relations | $R \cap S$ is an equivalence relation |
Cover the common mistakes from all topics for the final from Common Mistakes file.