Homework Assignment 3
Date Due: in lecture October 12, 1999
Late Deadline: in lecture October 19, 1999
One such example is a=0 and b=0, therefore the statement is true
x=0 is such a number since 20=1 and 010=0.
from the pythagorean theorem 32 + 42 = 52.
write the odd integers as n=2j+1 and m=2k+1. Then their sum is n+m = 2j+1+2k+1 = 2(j+k+1) which is obviously divisible by two.
This is not true, because 2 is a prime number and a positive integer
Theorem: The product of an even integer and an odd integer is even.
proof: ``Suppose m is an even integer and n is an odd integer. Ifis even, then by definition of even there exists an integer r such that
. Also, since m is even, there exists an integer p such that m = 2p and since n is odd there exists an integer q such that n=2q+1. Thus
![]()
where r is an integer. By definition of even, then, mn is even, as was to be shown.''
the mistake is that the proof begs the question: it starts out by supposing that mn is even, which is exactly what you're supposed to be proving.
yes:
.
yes:
.
yes:
which is
clearly divisible by 3.
yes: 2m (2m + 2) = 4m(m+1) = 4(m2 +m) which is divisible by 4.
yes:
which
is a multiple of 3a.
no: if a=10, b=5, c=5 then a is divisible by b and a is divisible by c but a is not divisible by bc
no: if a=15, b=3, c=5 then a is divisible by b and a is divisible by c but a is not divisible by b+c
no: if a=10, b=5, c=2 then a is divisible by b and a is divisible by c but a is not divisible by b-c
no: if a=10, b=5, c=2 then a is divisible by b and a is divisible by c but a is not divisible by b+c
yes: 29 is a prime number. Yet
is divisible by 29 since it's equal to
,
since 29 is a prime number you can't
multiply two integers together to get it, which means that 29 must be
a factor of n which is the same thing as saying n is divisible byu
29. Another (simpler) way is like this: